I RESPECT PRIVACY, do not gain from, engage in, or willfully assist tracking, or anything of that nature, concerned in matters such as this, hoping others would feel the same. However, Google tracking is presumed and beyond my control because this blog is on Blogger. * I do not profit from this in any way whatsoever.
* Also, assume ad tracking with all links and URLs below.
✅ A KEY POINT TO ALL THIS IS ALL SO MANY ARE PROGRAMMED THE SAME. YOU NEED VARIETY. IT IS ESSENTIAL. ⁿ¹
ⁿ¹ You can find grammar type issues in any writing, especially now because of hesitancy allowing checkers any more access to my thoughts about this than they already have.
NOTE: See far below, an integrated LanguageTool style, grammar, spelling, & punctuation checker, a courtesy of languagetool.org. It accepts up to 20,000 characters. Try it.
☝ 1) There is a list of the best free online style, grammar, spelling, and punctuation checkers, carefully selected to avoid the “boilerplate code” problem common with all too many online.
☝ 2) Also, there is a sub-group list having similar “boilerplate code” with each other and advice on minimizing the effect.
☝ 3) URLs are provided to others possibly worth trying.
“Importantly, Assume Your Document Is Always Subject To improvement, ....”
☝ Running a check with one in the first section below may be adequate. However, safely assume two or more are required: Please accept that documents of importance (e.g., a resumé) require three to five checks or more. Again, variety is essential.
I am an old-timer lacking technical computer knowledge. Mindful of it, despite the first five of eight in the first section below having some programming similarities, they each have significant independence uncommon from each other and each of the remaining three. Perhaps improperly coined but understood, there is no significant “boilerplate code” problem common with all too many online checkers.
It may be best not to use more than one from the last three of eight in the first section below. Each is coded independently of each of the first five, but they may be too similar to each other. Again, I cannot be sure of this paragraph or the one above.
Only begin the checking after including all essential and persuasive ideas, whether imperfectly worded or these online checkers cannot achieve your most optimum writing. Until you do, the first 20 checks will not get it right. Only then should the checking begin. Importantly, Assume Your Document Is Always Subject To improvement, with its own rule, a very hard-to-follow caveat, the yellow bottom-line rule (of this part). Because most people do not even come close to reaching the exception, not exerting themselves enough, the assumption should be a presumption for life, even safe for Everyone. To this day, I am uncertain if the yellow bottom-line rule is even correct (but remember to keep copies of your old work)! For an important writing subject to modification, it probably is wrong, yet it has a diminished return value notable for everyone.
With effort, you also learn from these checkers, both contributing to improved writing ability. Hard work shows, and improvement naturally occurs. Importantly, however, enhance it more and faster by delving into the dictionaries, and even much more Deeply and faster by also delving into the rules underlying suggestions.
Technology today is astonishing. Some perhaps even learning a writing idiosyncrasy, the tendency of a particular error.
Improvement is your goal, not the status quo. You were only pacified and should have felt unsatisfied. You may not realize it immediately, taking time through hindsight. Making the best of what is out there, you now made it better, with past ways tossed, near-forgotten. From now on, only the best sources will suffice, knowing how to work’em, yes, Their idiosyncrasy too. Quite nice of you to assume they are kind people you used in the past, so a bit behind, whatever, they’re still back there.
I must somehow learn to adhere to this near-impossible rule:
There Comes A Time When You Are Not To Touch It Anymore! ⁿ²
ⁿ² Afternote (in time): I have to note this, probably my final conclusion. The problem is that we do not fully know ourselves. However, if you were correct in knowing your good days and only making edits on those days, a document’s improvement is infinite!
Sincerely, /L.S./ flawpc
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Incidentally, apps, extensions, or add-ons may not be as helpful as a usable online version they may offer. You should almost always want the best at all times. One’s experience will prove that none, and I mean none, are good enough. Keep it in mind at all times.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please, Beware, You Can Have The Most Horrifying Issue Imaginable, Even Beyond Imagination, glaringly inconsistent with everything surrounding it, dead-center for the world to see for a while, quite obvious, yes, almost as if they intended it, multiple checks yet (with the same service)! Oh, How You Most Definitely Need Variety (and do not wait long, also, I mean Horrifying!)!
It all comes down to getting it right the best you can yourself first and within you in modifications and successive proofreading. You Cannot Rely Upon These Services To Catch The Errors You Make (though they help). Never have anything close to total reliance on them, being both wise and prudent with little reliance. First, safely rely upon yourself, the good sense God gave you. Furthermore, hopefully, knowing educational efforts have great rewards, proven fact, so even beyond the dictionaries, use proven wisdom in life, directly embracing the rules of writing itself. Deviations increase the potential for Horrification and delays your mastery of writing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Best Free Online Style, Grammar, Spelling, & Punctuation Checkers (below are URLs to others possibly worth trying)
1. Grammarly: Free Writing Assistant. Or the URL: https://app.grammarly.com/. They are GREAT ᶠⁿ¹, so good it feels strange. It is hard to believe only a computer is thinking as if a human mind is in the background. Note: They are always best to use for one check (except only as noted below, a possible GrammarLookup exception). Also, they are always best to use first for two or more.
ᶠⁿ¹ They naturally are subject to error or oversight.
2. ProWritingAid. Or the URL: https://prowritingaid.com/en/Analysis/WebEditor/Go?redirectToDocs=true. They have an extremely short 500-word limit (though uncertain when applied), contrary to others listed. Also, they may suggest changes that seem fine and in style as is. Perhaps check with Grammarly before making some changes. However, there may be enough value of merit, especially when a critical document such as a resumé is involved. In that case, it may be best to make the changes, but afterward, confirm there is no problem with it with Grammarly. Note: Despite everything stated, without question, they still are great. Afternote (in time): They seem to be getting better with time, Possibly better than Grammarly now! Afternote (to the afternote): Grammarly still seems the best, but it is close. Through the implication above, I intend online services, not any apps, extensions, add-ons, etc.
3. GrammarLookup, Punctuation Checker – Free Online Grammar Checker. Or the URL: https://www.grammarlookup.com/. Note: for a quick single source, it is one to consider. However, it only applies if you do not want to spend a little time with Grammarly online that discloses the paid corrections (with a yellow underscore), allowing them to be worked on until corrected. In that case, GrammarLookup may provide more corrections (although perhaps informal or somewhat less than perfect in style). Otherwise, Grammarly is always best to use for one check (and again, they should be the first of two or more). Afternote (in time): They already were good, and they may be getting better with time. I should note that they are good for long documents too.
4. LanguageTool - Online Grammar, Style & Spell Checker. Or the URL: https://languagetool.org/. Unfortunately, they seem to have an unknown word limit, contrary to Grammarly above. Note: Importantly, also contrary, Grammarly online discloses the paid corrections (with a yellow underscore), allowing them to be worked on until corrected.
5. Scribens, Free, Powerful English Grammar Checker. Or the URL: https://www.scribens.com/plugin.html?plugin=Wysiwyg&&version=2&&idclient=1. Note: Occasionally, they may prove more helpful than any listed here. However, the feature allowing it may not open for some browsers or devices, STYLE, displayed in the left column. The affected browsers or devices are unknown. It has options for invaluable advice, merely vocabulary enhancements for many people.
Although independent coding appears to be a part of these last three, they may be too similar to each other:
6. Essay-Lib.com. Or the URL: https://essay-lib.com/free-tools/grammar-checker/.
7. Dupli Checker. Or the URL: https://www.duplichecker.com/grammar-checker.php.
8. Coderduck, Grammar Checker, Grammar Check Spell Check. Or the URL: https://www.coderduck.com/grammar-checker. Note: Although not always correct, they may be first or second for punctuation.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
URLs to Others Possibly Worth Trying
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No comments:
Post a Comment